![]() 1 Commits are immutable: you can't add anything, remove anything, or change anything. Git doesn't: a tag is just another name for a specific commit. F ĬVS tags individual files, so this makes sense there. ![]() F Īfter you checkout v1.2, make your changes and commit you have this. Thinking about it visually, you have something like this. Just don't checkout another branch until you're done and have moved your tag or you'll lose your place. That's ok, you can work and make commits. That means there's no branch pointing at this commit. Git will tell you you're on a "detached HEAD". Move the tag to the new commit: git tag -f.So you need to make a new commit with your changes and move the tag there. Normally git tag won't let you do this, tags aren't supposed to move, so you have to force it with -f. How do I make this certain file or files available to the tags when the master has already moved forward?Ī tags in Git is just a label that points at a commit. # Move the V1-latest tag to the same commit as V1.2.2 Or if you maintain multiple versions of your software you can have V1-latest which you keep pointed at the latest release of the version 1 branch. If you want you can provide a latest tag to point at the latest release. Consider following Semantic Versioning and have bugfixes be released as a new version with a new tag: V1.2.1 and V1.2.2 and so on. Its generally bad form to change a release after its been released when users check out V1.2 they want to get version 1.2.Ĭonsider leaving release tags alone and instead having a stable or maintenance or V1.x branch you keep updated. There is a better way to accomplish that then to change the content of release tags. This will keep the history the same, and it will not change the record of the branch’s history.The goal is to make this files available in the repo so that anyone who wants to generate the release versions can grab these files and include them in the release versions. ![]() You could also make a new commit that signifies exactly the same state of the venture as f414f31.Also, the commits you did after f414f31 will no longer be included in the history of your master branch. Yet, this is rewriting the history of your branch, so if you share your branch with anyone it is best to not use this option. This can be done with git reset –hard f414f31. You could make your current branch to point to the older commit instead.(You can find that via git log or by viewing any history browser.) You then have a few different choices dependent on what you would like to do: Here is another example, presume that the good commit that you want to go back to is f414f31. HEAD shows your current branch, or current commit, meaning that all git reset –hard HEAD will do is to throw away all of the uncommitted changes you have. Then it will make the files in the working tree and the index (“staging area”) the same as the versions committed in.Make your present branch (typically master) back to point at.When you want to revert to a past commit using git reset – – hard, add. For example, if you do git add to stage a newer version of the file, this will override the past staged version of the file in the staging area. But be sure to note that Git does not take track of changes to your files. When you have created a commit, which will have your project files stored in a particular state, they ae safe. Git records the state of the files when you stage them with git add or when you make a commit. ![]() Be sure to always double check that the output of git status is empty (clean) before you begin using it. Luckily there is an easy solution to follow to correct this.įirst of all git reset - hard is a very dangerous command because it eliminates all of your noncommitted changes. A question that comes up with developers is how to use git reset– hard HEAD to revert to previous commit.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |